The Crest Hill city council tonight held a work session to look at ways in which to raise more revenue. They discussed many item at length including higher fines, fees, and utility taxes. One of the taxes they are looking at is expanding the amusement tax to cover Cottonwood Farm's Halooween celebration.
For the past several years, Crest Hill has been after Cottonwood Farm for a variety of issues. I do not know when or why they decided that they had it out for this long time local business. No other Crest Hill business advertises as widely as they do and makes an effort to bring people from as large an area to Crest Hill as they do. From billboards in Chicago to crop images that are seen by passing airplanes. This business does more to bring attention to Crest Hill than any other business. Yet, the Mayor and his allies target this business more so than any other in the city.
How is it that the business they want to drive away is a farm that provides entertainment, greenspace, advertising, and tax revenues to the city while being a good neighbor and citizen; while thet happily allow preditory payday loan stores proliferate?
I think it is time to demand some answers and to recoginize that this is not an attempt to raise revenue, but is just the lastest assault on this particular business.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Friday, March 7, 2008
Forum for New Libraries
On Thursday, March 6, the Des Plaines Valley Public Library District held a forum at Richland School to discuss the current status and future needs of its libraries. The forum concentrated on the Crest Hill branch and on the deficiencies of the building and current level of funding. The purpose of the forum seemed to be to sell the community on the need for a new library. However, no further thought went into it, so we were all left without a sense of where things go from here.
The assumption is that a new library was needed. Actually, three new libraries, one for each Crest Hill, Lockport, and Romeoville would be needed. We also know that the district has been hiring consultants to evaluate the current buildings and look at what sort of new facilities are needed. What we do not know is what type of time frame is being contemplated for future action. We do not have even a clue of how much these new libraries are going to cost or what that will mean for tax rates. And we do not know what these libraries would contain or look like. All of this is important information that will have an effect on people’s opinions and feelings.
Even among the small group of people who attending this forum, a range of positions could begin to be seen. It is my feeling that this lack of information intensified negative feelings and weakened positive feelings. This will continue to be the case as time goes on and will form the basis of long-term opinions if solid facts do not start being presented soon. There are many in this community that cannot afford higher taxes and are especially opposed to anything that they consider wasteful. These people will need to be won over to the need for a library and without knowing specifics of what is being proposed will soon imagine a building that is huge, architecturally complex, state of the art, and very expensive. This idea that they imagined will be what they will be voting on, not the reality of what will be proposed. And those who support the idea of a better library system will soon find that it is hard to get behind an abstract idea.
Speaking for myself, I strongly support a new library. I oppose most tax increases and have rarely seen a referendum that I like. However, I would vote to double the library portion of my tax bill without reservation, as long as I got a library that had adequate computer resources, comfortable areas in which to read, and a convenient location. There are many other features to a library, but these are the ones that have value to me. Until, I know that this new facility will meet my needs, it is hard for me to strongly support it. I certainly do not oppose a new library, but I am left feeling less than enthusiastic.
The library board needs to quickly take the next step and decide among three options; maintain the existing libraries, renovate and modernize the existing libraries, or build new libraries. Maintaining the existing facilities without major renovation and modernization will lead to a slow decay and death of our local libraries. However, renovating and modernizing them would cost a great deal of money to add very little in terms of space or functionality. Deciding to build new libraries is the only sensible choice if we want to have quality facilities at a moderate cost for the coming decades.
If the library board were to agree and make the decision to build new libraries, they should then explore what the communities want in their library. This phase should also look at what the future of libraries might be, in order to design facilities for tomorrow instead of for yesterday or even today. We are only a century removed from inaccessible library stacks, only a few decades removed from libraries as silent, studious places, and only a decade removed from libraries having just a few computers in a side room with limited access. It would be foolish to think that 20 or 40 years down the road, libraries will look much like they do today. This is the time for public comment on individual ideas and on overall plans.
Once, the library board, with citizen’s input, has decided on what they feel is needed, a referendum should follow quickly. A long drawn out process, builds apathy instead of support. Trying to drum up support for replacing the current libraries is more difficult that trying to get support for a specific new libraries. Show us what you want to build and tell us what you want to spend.
The assumption is that a new library was needed. Actually, three new libraries, one for each Crest Hill, Lockport, and Romeoville would be needed. We also know that the district has been hiring consultants to evaluate the current buildings and look at what sort of new facilities are needed. What we do not know is what type of time frame is being contemplated for future action. We do not have even a clue of how much these new libraries are going to cost or what that will mean for tax rates. And we do not know what these libraries would contain or look like. All of this is important information that will have an effect on people’s opinions and feelings.
Even among the small group of people who attending this forum, a range of positions could begin to be seen. It is my feeling that this lack of information intensified negative feelings and weakened positive feelings. This will continue to be the case as time goes on and will form the basis of long-term opinions if solid facts do not start being presented soon. There are many in this community that cannot afford higher taxes and are especially opposed to anything that they consider wasteful. These people will need to be won over to the need for a library and without knowing specifics of what is being proposed will soon imagine a building that is huge, architecturally complex, state of the art, and very expensive. This idea that they imagined will be what they will be voting on, not the reality of what will be proposed. And those who support the idea of a better library system will soon find that it is hard to get behind an abstract idea.
Speaking for myself, I strongly support a new library. I oppose most tax increases and have rarely seen a referendum that I like. However, I would vote to double the library portion of my tax bill without reservation, as long as I got a library that had adequate computer resources, comfortable areas in which to read, and a convenient location. There are many other features to a library, but these are the ones that have value to me. Until, I know that this new facility will meet my needs, it is hard for me to strongly support it. I certainly do not oppose a new library, but I am left feeling less than enthusiastic.
The library board needs to quickly take the next step and decide among three options; maintain the existing libraries, renovate and modernize the existing libraries, or build new libraries. Maintaining the existing facilities without major renovation and modernization will lead to a slow decay and death of our local libraries. However, renovating and modernizing them would cost a great deal of money to add very little in terms of space or functionality. Deciding to build new libraries is the only sensible choice if we want to have quality facilities at a moderate cost for the coming decades.
If the library board were to agree and make the decision to build new libraries, they should then explore what the communities want in their library. This phase should also look at what the future of libraries might be, in order to design facilities for tomorrow instead of for yesterday or even today. We are only a century removed from inaccessible library stacks, only a few decades removed from libraries as silent, studious places, and only a decade removed from libraries having just a few computers in a side room with limited access. It would be foolish to think that 20 or 40 years down the road, libraries will look much like they do today. This is the time for public comment on individual ideas and on overall plans.
Once, the library board, with citizen’s input, has decided on what they feel is needed, a referendum should follow quickly. A long drawn out process, builds apathy instead of support. Trying to drum up support for replacing the current libraries is more difficult that trying to get support for a specific new libraries. Show us what you want to build and tell us what you want to spend.
Time Off
I had expected to post a number of times since my last post. However, illness and personal matter have kept me from posting and have also kept me from attending a number of city council meetings and work sessions. I still have some items on which to write and look forward to doing so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
