Looking to the Future

The Crest Hill City Council has still not balanced the current budget, however that has not stopped them from committing to spending money out of future budgets.  They apparently feel that it is better to try to bust future budgets instead of fixing the current one. 

This is topped off by the fact that the expenditure was for landscaping the medians at the intersection of Weber and Renwick roads at at cost of $20,000 - 30,000.  Both of these are county roads, but the county has the sense not to pay such a high cost for landscaping in the middle of a roadway.  Romeoville is paying a similar amount to landscape their half of the intersection though and a number of Crest Hill officials did not want our half to not match theirs.  So the taxpayers will be stuck paying to keep up with our neighboring community and rejecting the county's offer to pave the median like they have elsewhere around the county.

The only council member to question this expenditure was Alderman Sternisha, who was quickly shot down by another alderman who saw no problem spending future year's money since it did not impact the budget they were currently looking at.  Alderman Convery also brought up the need to beautify this gateway to the city.  However, if we are looking to beautify I can think of many other places to do work at a lower cost.  For example, a number of commercial property owners in this city have decided that mowing is unnecessary.  It would cost the city far less to enforce its weed ordinance and would go a long way to make our commercial properties attractive to developers and businesses. 

If we really want to make this an attractive community; lets balance our budget, have property owners along our main thoroughfares clean up their properties, look for less expensive ways to enhance all of our entrances, and not commit future funds unless future revenue sources have been identified. 

I am all for planning for tomorrow, but those plans should not be how to create future deficits to add to the one we are currently facing.

TIF District Under Consideration

The City Council will be discussing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts at tonight's work session.  TIF districts are a tool that has been used by cities to promote economic development of depressed areas.  Such districts are not without controversy though because the benefits they provide come at a cost to other areas and taxing bodies.

A TIF district is a defined area encompassing all the properties within the boundaries that are created for it.  The amount of property taxes received by each of the taxing bodies is frozen for 23 years.  Over those years as the property values increase, the taxes paid also increase; but the increased amount is paid to the city and goes to a designated TIF fund.  That increased amount is the tax increment.  This money is then used to pay for improvements within the TIF district that are meant to attract new development to the TIF district.  These improvements can be anything from streetscaping to parking garages to even providing incentives directly to businesses.  The funds are not supposed to pay for ordinary operating expenses such as filling potholes, plowing streets, or providing police protection.  The area encompassed within a TIF district are meant to be properties that are currently blighted and are not reasonably expected to be able to be improved otherwise.

Many cities have used TIF districts to create new economic development and have seen them as very useful tools.  They feel that without the TIF districts redevelopment of blighted areas would not have been possible.  TIF districts are able to provide large amounts of money for redevelopment especially in cases where the improvements are put in early on using borrowed money and then paid back over the 23 years as the increased tax increment dollars are collected.  This of course exposes the city to the risk that the increase is not sufficient to pay back the debt.

TIF districts are opposed by some because of the effect they can have on other taxing bodies, their long life, and their misuse in some cities.  The amount that other taxing bodies receive in property taxes from a TIF district are frozen for 23 years.  The reasoning behind this is that these are blighted properties that would not otherwise have increased in value if not for the improvements.  However, this is a false notion because one would be hard pressed to find any property in this area, even the most blighted, that is today paying less in taxes than they were in 1986.  A rising tide lifts all boats.  This means that the schools, parks, and fire districts are losing out on revenue they otherwise would have collected even if no new development had happened. 

TIF districts can also create new costs for other taxing bodies that did not previously exist.  If a TIF district is developed to include condos and other residential uses in an area that previously had none there are no more students to be educated, but no additional funds to pay for that education.  The rest of the taxpayers outside of the TIF district would have to pick up that cost.  The same would be true of increased need for policing if the TIF contained additional commercial uses such as bars, restaurants, and shopping.  Many proponents of TIF districts claim that they do not increase anyone's taxes.  However, the additional costs created that cannot be paid using TIF funds must be paid for by someone and that someone will be all the taxpayers outside of the TIF district.

The third concern raised is the misuse of TIF districts.  They are meant for blighted and depressed areas that would not otherwise be able to be redeveloped into a higher, better use.  There are certainly cities that have found areas that this applies to.  However, others have taken areas that are already improving and used TIF districts to speed the process along or to be able to provide even greater economic incentives to developers.  TIF districts were not meant to be used as a common economic development tool in all situations, they are instead meant for specific circumstances.  This is a concern because of the costs that TIF districts can impose upon other taxing bodies and on the taxpayers.  That cost may be worthwhile if it leads to development that would not otherwise be possible, but it would be a high price to pay for development that could have been brought about by other means.

I have been involved in the creation and administration of TIF districts in other cities and have seen the potential benefits they offer as well as the problems they create.  Before the city creates on, it is important that we all are educated and informed.  This means that we need to know exactly what properties will be included, what the money will be spent on, if financial incentives are being given to businesses, and what the impact on the schools and other taxing bodies will be.  Following tonight's work session, I will post details of what is being proposed by the city as well as my own analysis of the information presented.